I feel like the discussions leading into the upcoming presidential election have revolved around a single question.
"Which do American voters value more: Morals or Policies?"
Obviously, everyone knows the stereotype that all politicians are immoral. However, it has become very apparent in the recent presidential race that some politicians have more of a moral code than others. At the same time, it appears that policies are the major factors drawing voters in.
So let's imagine you have two potential candidates. You like them equally, but for different reasons. You are aware of a major distinction between them.
CANDIDATE A has strong policies, but a weak moral code.
CANDIDATE B has weak policies, but a strong moral code.
When it comes time to vote, you decide to consider NOTHING but the balance between their policies and morals.
Which would you choose? Candidate A, or Candidate B? Do you choose a moralistic candidate over a candidate with strong policies, or vice versa?
I'm inviting my readers to express their opinions via the comments section or social media engagements. Any arguments may be featured in the follow-up post on Saturday.
I look forward to hearing what you have to say.
 |
| You may notice a certain individual who was previously blacklisted on Change and Cherish Blog. Don't worry; more explanations are soon to come. |
Morals. A good person will try to do what they genuinely believe is the best. They'll feel passionate about what they're doing. An amoral candidate might have good policies, but their commitment or true intent could be misleading.
ReplyDeleteMorals. A good person will try to do what they genuinely believe is the best. They'll feel passionate about what they're doing. An amoral candidate might have good policies, but their commitment or true intent could be misleading.
ReplyDeleteI agree that morals are more important, but not the only deciding factor. How can one trust that an immoral candidate will follow through with their policies? It also depends on the nature of the candidate's morality (or immorality). A candidate might have genuine care for the poor but does not respect religion, tradition, or race. The most important factor (for me) is that a candidate's policies stem from quality morals. Unfortunately it is virtually impossible to have a candidate whose policies I will agree with entirely, which is why knowing the moral integrity of the candidate is essential.
ReplyDelete